Seven years abroad or status in another country and your permanent residency expired? Regulation 11A, adequate connection, Procedure 5.2.0018, Al-Haq and appeals.
Many holders of a permanent residence licence in Israel discover that their status has expired only when they apply to renew an identity card, register a new address, or pass through border control at Ben Gurion Airport. The news comes as a surprise, because no one sent a letter and no one held a hearing: under the law, a permanent residence licence may expire of its own accord, without any positive decision by the Population and Immigration Authority.
The legal basis lies in Regulation 11(c) of the Entry into Israel Regulations, 5734-1974, which provides that a permanent residence licence shall expire, among other circumstances, if the licence holder has left Israel and settled in a country outside Israel. Regulation 11A of the Regulations adds a presumption: a person shall be regarded as having settled in a country outside Israel if any one of three conditions is met:
• he has stayed outside Israel for a period of at least seven years; • he has received a permanent residence licence in that country; • he has acquired the citizenship of that country by way of naturalisation.
It is important to be precise: the Regulation does not speak of seven "consecutive" years, and it does not provide that a short visit to Israel resets the count. The Supreme Court held as early as HCJ 282/88 Awad v. Prime Minister that a permanent residence licence rests on a reality of permanent residence, and when that reality ceases to exist, the licence expires from within. In that case it was held that periodic visits and a declared intention to return do not, in themselves, preserve the status. The true test is therefore the centre of life test, and the three conditions in Regulation 11A are presumptions designed to apply it.
As to foreign citizenship, Population Authority Procedure 5.2.0018 clarifies that the reference is to citizenship acquired by way of an application for naturalisation, not citizenship acquired automatically, and that it does not refer to the citizenship of the country on whose passport the applicant first received the permanent residence licence. The Procedure further provides that where a person was a minor when his parents moved their centre of life outside Israel, the question of his residency will generally be examined from the date he reached majority, and the period preceding that date will not be taken into account.
A person whose residence licence has expired is regarded, under Procedure 5.2.0018 itself, as someone present in Israel without a residence licence. The practical significance is severe: section 13(a) of the Entry into Israel Law, 5712-1952, provides that a person who is not an Israeli citizen or an oleh and is present in Israel without a residence licence – a person unlawfully present – shall be removed from Israel, and the removal is carried out under a removal order issued by the Minister of the Interior. Accordingly, anyone who discovers that his status has been recorded as expired is best advised not to leave Israel until the matter is resolved, since re-entry may be refused.
At the day-to-day level, the Population Authority bureaus do not issue an identity card to a permanent resident whose record shows a status of "former" or "ceased to be a resident" before the question of expiry has been examined under the visa procedures, and other registry services are blocked as well. This means that the expiry is usually discovered precisely at the counter, in the course of a routine request.
A distinction must be drawn between permanent resident status under the Entry into Israel Law and residency for the purposes of National Insurance and national health insurance. The National Insurance Institute applies its own independent centre of life test: a resident who has gone abroad continues to be registered as a resident during the first five years after departure, and a returning resident is required to complete a residency determination questionnaire. A person who returns after a prolonged absence may also face a waiting period for health insurance, which can be redeemed by payment. A challenge to a residency decision of the National Insurance Institute is filed with the Regional Labour Court within 12 months of the rejection letter – not with the Appeals Tribunal. The two tracks affect one another but are not identical, and both must be handled in parallel.
Procedure 5.2.0018 – the Procedure for Expiry of a Permanent Residence Licence – is the central document under which the bureaus operate. The Procedure enshrines the implementing instructions that the Minister of the Interior submitted to the Supreme Court in HCJ 2227/98 HaMoked: Center for the Defence of the Individual v. Minister of the Interior on 15.3.2000 (sometimes referred to as the "Sharansky procedure"), and it sets out two stages:
• First stage – "adequate connection" (זיקה נאותה): where the applicant appears in the registry as a person whose licence has expired, his adequate connection to Israel during the period of his stay abroad is examined. • Second stage – centre of life: if an adequate connection is found, the applicant will be asked to prove a centre of life in Israel during the last two years since his return. If he does so, the expiry will be cancelled in his record and he will receive the service requested.
The outcome of a successful process is cancellation of the expiry in the record – that is, restoration of the existing status, not the grant of a new status. The implementing instructions of 2000 add two important concessions: a person who was removed from the registry from 1995 onwards, visited Israel during the period of validity of the exit card (כרטיס יוצא) in his possession, and has been living in Israel for at least two years, will be regarded as having received a permanent residence licence from the date of his return; and a person whose licence expired under the law but whom the Ministry of the Interior did not notify and did not remove from the registry, will be regarded as holding a valid licence, provided that he visited Israel during the said period. The Procedure applies, mutatis mutandis, also to a person who moved his centre of life to the territories of Judea, Samaria and the Gaza Strip.
The Procedure does not define what constitutes an "adequate connection", and therein lies the heart of the legal contest. In practice, the matters examined include, among others, the frequency of visits to Israel, the existence of family members, property or businesses in Israel, and the circumstances that led the applicant to stay abroad. Centre of life in Israel is proven in accordance with Procedure 1.13.0001 (Examination and Determination of Centre of Life) by means of a lease or purchase agreement, a certificate of residence from the local authority, municipal tax (arnona), electricity and water bills, confirmation of health fund membership, pay slips and employer confirmations, school enrolment confirmations for the children, bank statements and the travel documents of all family members. The Authority requires all the documents to be submitted together, in original or in a certified true copy, and allows them to be completed within only 45 days of the date the application is filed – an application not completed in time will be regarded as cancelled. The decision is made on the basis of the entirety of the evidence and after an interview with the applicant.
It should be emphasised that the other two grounds of expiry – receipt of a permanent residence licence or naturalisation in another country – remain, under the implementing instructions, within the discretion of the Ministry of the Interior in light of the applicant's personal circumstances and the totality of his connections. In these cases, too, there is room for a well-reasoned and thoroughly documented application.
Many of those who approach us regarding the expiry of permanent residency are residents of East Jerusalem, whose status was determined in the registration carried out after 1967. In HCJ 282/88 Awad, the Supreme Court held that East Jerusalem residents are subject to the Entry into Israel Law and are regarded as having received a permanent residence licence – and hence that the law of expiry applies to them as well. In that case, a person who had emigrated to the United States and been naturalised there was found to have settled outside Israel, and his status expired.
The case law developed significantly in AAA 3268/14 Al-Haq v. Minister of the Interior (2017). The Supreme Court, per Justice Fogelman with the concurrence of Justice Mazuz and President Naor, held that East Jerusalem residents are native residents, whose connection to the place differs fundamentally from that of immigrants. Where a native resident who has preserved a connection to the place returns and seeks to restore his status, the application should as a rule be granted – in the absence of a security, criminal or other weighty reason – and the Minister of the Interior must give due weight to his status as a native and to the absence of any alternative status. In that case it was held that the appellant should be granted a permanent residence licence, or alternatively a temporary residence licence for two years followed by permanent status subject to proof of centre of life. President Naor emphasised that each case is examined according to its circumstances and according to the Minister's policy. This approach was applied in further case law of the same year.
According to Ministry of the Interior figures published by HaMoked: Center for the Defence of the Individual, more than 14,000 East Jerusalem residents lost their status between 1967 and 2014. The Al-Haq ruling gives many of them a solid basis for an application to restore status, provided that the application is supported by substantial evidence of a preserved connection and of a current centre of life.
An application to restore status is filed at the Population Authority bureau, in person, together with the relevant application form and payment of a fee according to the schedule of fees. A refusal by the bureau is not the end of the road, but the time limits are short and binding:
• Internal appeal: under Procedure 1.6.0001, only one internal appeal may be filed, in writing, without delay and no later than 21 days from the date the decision was received, at the bureau where the decision was given. An appeal filed after this date will not be handled. Filing is not subject to a fee, and the decision on the appeal must be reasoned and in writing. • Appeal to the Appeals Tribunal: decisions under the Entry into Israel Law may be appealed to the Appeals Tribunal by virtue of section 13כד of the Law, within 30 days from the date notice of the decision was received or the date on which it became known, whichever is earlier. The Tribunal hears the matter on the grounds and with the powers of a court for administrative matters, may order the Authority to produce its file, and is empowered to grant interim relief. • Administrative appeal: a final decision of the Appeals Tribunal may be appealed as of right to the District Court sitting as the Court for Administrative Matters, within 45 days from the date the decision was given or served.
Important to know: the mere filing of an application or an internal appeal does not prevent removal from Israel or being held in detention, unless a judicial decision ordering a stay of execution has been given. In appropriate cases, steps should be taken to obtain such an order in parallel with the main proceeding.
A person who does not meet the adequate connection test and has no other status in Israel may consider filing an application for status on special humanitarian grounds under Procedure 5.2.0022, which is considered by the Inter-Ministerial Committee and decided by the Authority's Director General. This is a residual and slow track, and it should not be regarded as a substitute for a well-founded application to restore status.
Our office accompanies permanent residents whose status has been recorded as expired – whether they discovered this at the bureau, at border control or in a letter from the Population Authority – as well as family members who wish to prepare in advance before returning to Israel. Our assistance includes examination of the entry and exit records and of the factual basis for the determination of expiry, building an organised evidentiary file for the adequate connection and the centre of life, preparation for the interview, drafting the application and its legal arguments in light of the Awad and Al-Haq rulings – and, where necessary, filing an internal appeal, an appeal to the Appeals Tribunal, an administrative appeal and an application for a stay of execution. In parallel, we assist in resolving the residency question vis-a-vis the National Insurance Institute. There is no guarantee of any result, and each case is examined individually according to its circumstances.
For any question about the expiry or restoration of permanent residency, you are welcome to contact us via WhatsApp or the contact form on the website to arrange a consultation.
Not necessarily, but nor is the opposite true. Regulation 11A establishes a presumption of settlement abroad after a stay of at least seven years, and the Supreme Court held in Awad that periodic visits do not, in themselves, preserve the status. On the other hand, the implementing instructions in Procedure 5.2.0018 allow a person who visited Israel and returned to live there to be regarded as someone whose status was preserved or restored. The decisive question is where your centre of life actually was and which connections to Israel were preserved, and this requires an individual examination of the evidence.
Under Regulation 11A(3), expiry applies to a person who acquired foreign citizenship by way of naturalisation, that is, upon application. Procedure 5.2.0018 clarifies that citizenship acquired automatically, as well as the citizenship of the country on whose passport you first received the permanent residence licence, are not covered by this ground. Even where the ground is met, the implementing instructions leave its application to the discretion of the Ministry of the Interior in light of the totality of the applicant's connections, and a well-reasoned and documented application is therefore important.
Procedure 5.2.0018 expressly provides that, for those who were minors when their parents moved their centre of life outside Israel, the question of residency will generally be examined from the date they reached majority, and the period preceding that date will not be taken into account. This is a central argument for anyone born in Israel who left it in childhood, and it should be supported by evidence of age at the time of departure and of the connections preserved after reaching majority.
The Procedure requires personal attendance at the Population Authority bureau, and the second stage of the test concerns proof of a centre of life in Israel during the last two years since the return. In practice, a person who is abroad and whose status has been recorded as expired may encounter difficulty entering Israel, and it is therefore advisable to check the registry position and prepare legally before travelling. A person who discovers a record of expiry while in Israel is best advised not to leave until the matter is resolved.
The procedures do not set a binding deadline for a decision on an application to restore status. The fixed time limits apply, rather, to the applicant: completion of the centre of life documents within 45 days, an internal appeal within 21 days, an appeal to the Appeals Tribunal within 30 days and an administrative appeal within 45 days. The actual handling time varies from case to case, and in the absence of a response within a reasonable time, recourse to the courts may be considered.